CO129-459 - Individuals - 1919 — Page 81

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Board 75.

20.

Order

135.

21.

at a later time their evidence would not be regarded as so valuable, as if they were given at once. The Respondent Mr. Hallifax took down a record of the answers given and they were read over to the Appellant and signed by the Respondent Mr. Hallifax. The Appellant subsequently on the same day was liberated on bail.

The procedure followed in taking the examination was in accordance with section 4 sub-sections (6) and (7) of the Ordinance and was a practice which had been followed under this and previous Ordinances.

The Respondent Mr. Hallifax subsequently took the evidence of Mr. Eldon Potter, one of the witnesses named by the Appellant.

The other witness named by The Appellant viz:-

Record ...136.

Mr. D'Almada E. Castro wrote to the Respondent Mr. Hallifax on the 6th November 1918 stating that he had been professionally retained by the Appellant and further that the Appellant had been advised that before Mr. D'Almada E. Castro gave evidence he should be furnished with a copy of the warrant, copies of all statements made by witnesses for the Crown, and the formal charges and the answers made by the Appellant

On the 8th November Mr. D'Almada E. Castro wrote to the Colonial Secretary asking for copies of the same documents. This letter further put forward the contention that the

Edit History

2026-06-14 06:02:43 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

Board 75.20.Order135.21.79at a later time their evidence would not be regarded as so valuable, as if they were given at once. The Respondent Mr. Hallifax took down a record of the answers given and they were read over to the Appellant and signed by the Respondent Mr. Hallifax. The Appellant subsequently on the same day was liberated on bail.The procedure followed in taking the examination was in accordance with section 4 sub-sections (6) and (7) of the Ordinance and was a practice which had been followed under this and previous Ordinances.The Respondent Mr. Hallifax subsequently took the evidence of Mr. Eldon Potter, one of the witnesses named by the Appellant.The other witness named by The Appellant viz:-Record ...136.Mr. D'Almada E. Castro wrote to the Respondent Mr. Hallifax on the 6th November 1918 stating that he had been professionally retained by the Appellant and further that the Appellant had been advised that before Mr. D'Almada E. Castro gave evidence he should be furnished with a copy of the warrant, copies of all statements made by witnesses for the Crown, and the formal charges and the answers made by the AppellantOn the 8th November Mr. D'Almada E. Castro wrote to the Colonial Secretary asking for copies of the same documents. This letter further put forward the contention that the

Baseline (Original)

bord 75.20.oord135.21.79at a later time their evidence would not be regarded as so valuable, as if they were given at once. The Remondent Mr. Halifax took down a record of the answers given and they were read over to the Appellant and signed by the Respondent Mr. Hallifax. The Appellant subsequently on the same day was liberated on bail.The procedure followed in taking the examination was in accordance with section 4 sub-sections (6) and (7) of the Ordinance and was a practice which had been followed under this and previous Ordinances.The Respondent Mr. Hallifax subsequently took the evidence of Mr. Eldon Potter, one of the witnesses named by the Appellat.The other witness named by The Appellant viz:-cord..136.Mr. D'Almade E. Castro wrote to the Respondent Fr. Hallifax on the 6th November 1918 stating that he had been profession-cord137.ally retained by the Appellant and further that the Appellant had been advised that before Mr. d'Almade E. Castro gave evidence he should be furnished with a copy of the warrant, copies of all statements made by witnesses for the Orown, and the formal charges and the answers made by the AppellantUn the 8th November Kr. D'Almade E.Castro wrote to the Colonial Secretary asking for copies of the s'me documents. This letter further put forward the contention that the10

2026-06-14 06:02:43 · Baseline

View content

bord 75.

20.

oord

135.

21.

at a later time their evidence would not be regarded as so

valuable, as if they were given at once. The Remondent Mr.

Halifax took down a record of the answers given and they

were read over to the Appellant and signed by the Respondent

Mr. Hallifax. The Appellant subsequently on the same day

was liberated on bail.

The procedure followed in taking the examination was in

accordance with section 4 sub-sections (6) and (7) of the

Ordinance and was a practice which had been followed under

this and previous Ordinances.

The Respondent Mr. Hallifax subsequently took the evidence

of Mr. Eldon Potter, one of the witnesses named by the

Appellat.

The other witness named by The Appellant viz:-

cord

..136.

Mr. D'Almade E. Castro wrote to the Respondent Fr. Hallifax

on the 6th November 1918 stating that he had been profession-

cord

137.

ally retained by the Appellant and further that the Appellant

had been advised that before Mr. d'Almade E. Castro gave

evidence he should be furnished with a copy of the warrant,

copies of all statements made by witnesses for the Orown,

and the formal charges and the answers made by the Appellant

Un the 8th November Kr. D'Almade E.Castro wrote to the

Colonial Secretary asking for copies of the s'me documents.

This letter further put forward the contention that the

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.